"The basic moral problem that faces man as he moves into the
age of automation, the age of accelerating conquest of
nature, is whether he is really fit to live in an industrial
society; whether his institutions will adjust rapidly
enough; whether he will rivet himself with an absurd
institution like full employment in the economic order when
it is not only unnecessary but unadministratable in anything
but a slave society; whether freed from the necessity to
devote his brain and brawn to the production of goods and
services, he can address himself to the work of civilization
itself." (Louis O. Kelso, 1964)
ESOP: Employee Stock Ownership
Plan. The ESOP is designed to build capital ownership
into employees of a business in the course of
efficiently financing its growth or other worthwhile
corporate objectives, without touching employee
paychecks or savings. As to employees, the ESOP is that
constitutionally-mandated missing link that gives them
access to credit to buy the employer's capital stock
and, without personal risk or liability, to pay for it
from the pre-tax earnings of the assets underlying that
stock. In other words, equalizing their access to
capital credit with that of the already rich.
MUCOP: Mutual Capital Ownership
Plan. This financing method is intended to provide
pooled ESOP financing for a number of corporations while
building diversified portfolios of their stocks
individually for their employees.
CSOP: Consumer Stock Ownership
Plan. This technique is intended for use by public
utilities, banks, insurance companies, and other
businesses where long-term relationships between the
producer and its customers are the rule. Through the
intelligent use of credit, it builds capital ownership
for customers while providing unlimited low-cost
financing for growth of the corporation, thus raising
the power of the consumers to pay for their purchases of
goods and services while raising the power of the
corporation to produce goods and services. It would
normally be used in conjunction with an ESOP for
employees.
GSOP: General Stock Ownership
Plan. The GSOP is designed to build capital ownership
into politically designated classes of consumers within
the jurisdiction of the authorizing government - state,
local or federal.
ICOP: Individual Capital
Ownership Plan. A financing device intended to create
viable capital estates for selected categories of
individuals while opening broad markets for equity
financing by corporations.
RECOP: Residential Capital
Ownership Plan. This financing plan, in combination with
commercially insured credit financing, would enable home
buyers to purchase homes at less than 25 percent of the
out-of-pocket principal and interest cost of similar
transactions today, by having their acquisitions treated
by tax and other relevant laws as capital assets, rather
than as consumer items as at present
COMCOP: Commercial Capital
Ownership Plan. Ownership of rental structures, such as
office and apartment buildings, factories, mines,
railroads, hotels, resorts, etc., is a major source of
capital cash income. Today such structures and real
estate generally are owned by the excessively wealthy
(whose resulting income is thereby sterilized for
purposes of the consumer economy and denied to those who
could use it if the financing had been COMCOP
structured), who use such acquisitions not only to
satisfy their antisocial greed, but to wipe out their
income taxes. COMCOP would enable commercial structure
ownership legitimately to be spread over large numbers
of people where it can raise their power to produce the
incomes they need to make them powerful and
self-supporting consumers, maintain their lifestyles,
and to diversify their holdings in businesses in which
they become employed as capital workers.
PUBCOP: Public Capital Ownership
Plan. This plan is designed to provide low-cost
financing for capital instruments used by public bodies
of all types - office buildings, streets and sidewalks,
parks, street lighting, schools, universities, subways,
waterworks, harbors, etc. It permits broad individual
ownership, through facilities corporations, by great
numbers of people, while providing low-cost capital
facilities to be leased at market rates to cities and
other municipal corporations, states, the federal
government, and other public bodies. PUBCOP is another
tool in the arsenal of binary economics to assure that
each individual can become employed as a capital worker
and that governments do not acquire economic power that
should be diffused throughout the citizenry. PUBCOP
financing would employ the dual functions of binary
financing devices. It would be a major means of
eliminating the cost of wasteful, inefficient, and
inadequate public employee pensions while providing much
greater economic security and incomes, both before and
after retirement, to public employees and others.
All of these plans are discussed and
diagramed in more detail in Democracy and Economic
Power: Extending the ESOP Revolution through Binary
Economics.
All rights reserved
under International and Pan American Copyright
Conventions.
Library of Congress
Catalog Card Number:61-6562
Louis Kelso's books,
The Capitalist Manifesto
and The New Capitalists,
are now available to download in PDF form. You will
need the
Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print them.
The Capitalist
Manifesto and The New
Capitalists together comprise the first public
statement of Louis Kelso's seminal contribution to
political economics - a thesis Mortimer J. Adler, the
co-author, declared "the first clear and systematic
statement of the idea of capitalism that has ever been
presented to the world."
Despite its Cold War title,
The Capitalist Manifesto
of 1958 is neither a defense of traditional capitalism
nor a polemical call to revolution in the style of
The Communist Manifesto of
1848. It is a theoretical blueprint of the physical and
institutional structure of the western private property,
free market system identified by Adam Smith and the
classical economists; repudiated by Karl Marx and the
socialists,
and pragmatically compromised by J. Maynard Keynes. It
presents specific proposals for correcting and
perfecting the present system in the line of, and in the
light of, its own logic and principles. It invites men
and women of good will to set to work on the task of
building an economically just and generally affluent
society on the foundation of a Capitalism redeemed of
its historical flaws.
Louis Kelso's vision of Capitalism was,
in Dr. Adler's description, "the economically free and
classless society which supports political democracy and
which, above all, helps political democracy to preserve
the institutions of a free society." To Dr. Adler's
mind, this conception was "the most revolutionary idea
of the century."
Ten years after his death Louis Kelso is
beginning to be recognized as the originator of a
genuinely new paradigm in political economics. Although
introduced more than forty years ago, its concepts are
still virgin terrain because, despite their osmotic
influence in the United States, western and eastern
Europe, Russia and now China, relatively few people are
familiar with them.
Make no mistake, Louis Kelso's ideas are
just as controversial today as when he and Dr. Adler
introduced them in 1958. The Austrian economist
Schumpeter famously defined Capitalism as "creative
destruction." That is also the effect of a new paradigm
on its parent discipline. Louis Kelso's new paradigm
targets, first of all, the conventional premises of
economics. But since those premises are also embedded in
western political, economic and business institutions,
particularly the institutions of finance, Louis Kelso's
binary view exposes the fallacies at their heart as
well.
In showing the obsolete ideas at the
root of key institutions - the institutions that
concentrate wealth and frustrate the operating logic of
the free market - Louis Kelso changes the terms of the
age-old debate between Conservatives and Liberals and
Capital and Labor. And in doing that, he moves to new
and higher ground the ideological issues that have made
western society a battleground ever since the Industrial
Revolution. To understand Louis Kelso's binary paradigm
is to look at the economic and political world with new
eyes, from an exhilarating new perspective. The social
implications of this new view are revolutionary in the
best sense of that word.
Louis Kelso was fascinated by
technology. He began his investigation of the Great
Depression with painstaking research on the effects of
technological change on occupations, industries and the
macro-economy. While still in law school, he published a
monograph on how the computer, hardly invented then,
would revolutionize the practice of law. He eagerly
looked forward to the day when the computer would make
instantaneous world-wide communication possible.
Unfortunately he died a few years before the Internet
could make this a reality for him.
Now as we enter the new century and the
new millennium, Louis Kelso's binary economic paradigm
is even more important than when first introduced. The
demise of the Soviet Union has left the western market
economy free to dominate the world on its own terms.
Understanding market forces and learning how to exploit
them to build stable industrial democracies that are
also Good Societies for everyone who lives in them is
our most urgent task. Louis Kelso has given us the tools
- both conceptual and practical - to accomplish this
task. He has also inspired us with his generous vision
of the Good Society that advanced technology still
promises despite centuries of misunderstanding and
misuse.
In gratitude for the life and work
of Louis Kelso, and also in honor of his co-author, the
late Mortimer J. Adler, whose encouragement and
collaboration made these books possible, the Kelso
Institute takes great pleasure in electronically
publishing both The
Capitalist Manifesto and
The New Capitalists.
In so doing, we fulfill Louis Kelso's dearest wish in
life - that his ideas be made accessible to those who
will use them to build institutions that advance
civilization and support individuals in realizing their
highest potential.
Louis O. Kelso and Patricia Hetter Kelso estimates of the relative
real inputs to production in the American economy of Labor (Physical
and Intellectual) and Capital over time assuming reasonably
competitive markets. So ingrained is the “ethic” of the “Labor
Theory of Value” that they thought it best to refer to Capital
Owners as “Capital Workers” in keeping with their understanding that
Capital instruments do “Work” - as surely as the most diligent human
surrogate worker – and that indeed the observable trend is for
Capital Instruments to do ever more of the Worlds “Work”. The
reflexive prevalent attitude of equating “Economic” man with
Essential Human Values including the whole vast array of values
around the “Work Ethic” all contribute to camouflage and maintain
the fundamental miss-match between the way goods and services are
produced and distributed and particularly their trends projected
into the future. Cybernetic contributions (now almost exponential)
are only adding to the much longer Historical trend. Represents US
Economy but applies to World trending. HHC
Chart of concentration of capital ownership in the U.S. over time.
The same general pattern applies to virtually all economies of and
the World Economy as a whole – Plutocratic ownership and control of
the real means of production. With “The Labor Theory of Value” it
only worsens. HHC - Below Quotes @
www.kelsoinstitute.org
"Conventional wisdom says there is only
one way to earn a living, and that's to work. Conventional wisdom
effectively treats
capital (land, structures, machines,
and the like) as though it were a kind of holy water that, sprinkled
on or about labor, makes
it more productive. Thus, if you have
a thousand people working in a factory and you increase the design
and power of the
machinery so that one hundred men can
now do what a thousand did before, conventional wisdom says, 'Voila!
The productivity
of the labor has gone up 900 percent!'
I say 'hogwash.' All you've done is wipe out 90 percent of the jobs,
and even the remaining
ten percent are probably sitting around
pushing buttons. What the economy needs is a way of legitimately
getting capital
ownership into the hands of the people
who now don't have it." (Louis O. Kelso, Journal Asset Based
Finance, 1982)
"The trouble with today's techniques of
finance is that they're designed to make the rich richer. None are
designed to make the
poor richer. That's why the poor are
poor. Because they're not rich." (Louis O. Kelso, San Francisco Examiner
& Chronicle, 1978)
"The Roman arena was technically a
level playing field. But on one side were the lions with all the
weapons, and on the other
the Christians with all the blood.
That's not a level playing field. That's a slaughter. And so is
putting people into the economy
without equipping them with capital,
while equipping a tiny handful of people with hundreds and thousands
of times more
than they can use." (Louis O. Kelso, Bill Moyers: A World
of Ideas, 1990)
Louis O. Kelso (1913-1991) was a
lawyer and
economic thinker who sought to find a way to preserve
capitalism from the competition of
communism as an alternative within the context of the early
Cold War.
Louis O. Kelso (1913-1991) was a
lawyer and
economic thinker who sought to find a way to preserve
capitalism from the competition of
communism as an alternative within the context of the early
Cold War.
His non-conformist "capitalism" might be compared to the
peoples' capitalism ideas of
G. K. Chesterton in which ownership is distributed to as
many people as possible within the economy. Kelso developed the
idea of
Binary Economics to explain the need for expanded capital
ownership in light of industrial production and the dominance of
capital instead of labor.
In 1956 Louis Kelso invented the Employee Stock Ownership
Plan (ESOP) to put his ideas into practice. In 1958 he
collaborated with the philosopher
Mortimer Adler to write The Capitalist Manifesto that
is considered the primary source of his economic theories. Kelso
and Adler followed this book with The New Capitalists
(Random House, New York: 1961). Both books are readable online
from the Kelso Institute.
The distributive dynamics of capitalism by Louis
O Kelso, self-published; 2nd edition (1956)
The Capitalist Manifesto, by Louis O. Kelso and
Mortimer J. Adler, Random House, New York: 1958; reprinted
Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut: 1975. Also published
in French, Spanish, Greek and Japanese.
ISBN 0-8371-8210-7
The New Capitalists: A Proposal to Free Economic
Growth from the Slavery of Savings, by Louis O. Kelso
and Mortimer J. Adler, Random House, New York: 1961;
reprinted Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut: 1975. Also
published in Japanese.
ISBN 0-8371-8211-5
Two-Factor Theory: The Economics of Reality, by
Louis O. Kelso and Patricia Hetter, Random House, New York:
1967; paperback edition, Vintage Books: 1968. (Originally
published under the title How to Turn 80 Million Workers
into Capitalists on Borrowed Money.) Also published in
Spanish and German.
Democracy and Economic Power: Extending the ESOP
Revolution Through Binary Economics, by Louis O. Kelso
and Patricia Hetter Kelso, Ballinger Publishing Co.,
Cambridge, Massachusetts: 1986; reprinted by University
Press of America, Lanham, Maryland: 1991. Also available in
Russian and Chinese.
ISBN 0-8191-7909-4
WRITINGS BY LOUIS O. KELSO
Karl Marx: The Almost Capitalist, American Bar
Association Journal, March, 1957.
[2]
Corporate Benevolence or Welfare Redistribution?, The
Business Lawyer, January, 1960.
Labor's Great Mistake: The Struggle for the Toil State,
American Bar Association Journal, February, 1960.
Welfare State - American Style, Challenge, The Magazine
of Economic Affairs, New York University, October, 1963.
The Case for the 100% Dividend Payout, Trends (published
by Georgeson & Co.), New York, December, 1963.
Poverty and Profits, by Hostetler, Kelso, Long, Oates,
the Editors, Harvard Business Review, September-October,
1964.
Beyond Full Employment, Title News (the Journal of the
American Land Title Association), November, 1964.
Cooperatives and the Economic Power to Consume, The
Cooperative Accountant (published by the National Society of
Accountants for Cooperatives), Winter, 1964.
Why Not Featherbedding?, Challenge, September-October
1966. (Reprinted in American Controversy: Readings and
Rhetoric, by Paul K. Dempsey and Ronald E. McFarland, Scott,
Foresman and Company, Glenview, Illinois: 1968.)
The Economic Foundation of Freedom, The American
Prospect: Insights into Our Next 100 Years, Houghton Mifflin
Company, Boston: 1977.
Labor's Untapped Wealth: An Address by Louis Kelso, Air
Line Pilot, October, 1984.
WRITINGS BY LOUIS O. KELSO AND PATRICIA HETTER KELSO
Uprooting World Poverty: A Job for Business, Business
Horizons, Fall, 1964. (Reprinted in Mercurio, Anno VIII, No.
8, Rome, Italy, August, 1965; Far Eastern Economic Review,
Vol. L, No. 1, Hong Kong, October, 1965. Winner of the First
Place 1964 McKinsey Award for Significant Business Writing.)
Poverty's Other Exit, North Dakota Law Review, January,
1965.
Equality of Economic Opportunity Through Capital
Ownership, Social Policies for America in the Seventies,
edited by Robert Theobald, Doubleday & Co., New York: 1968.
(Excerpts from this essay reprinted in Current, April,
1968.)
Reparations and the Churches, Business Horizons,
December, 1969.
Invisible Violence of Corporate Finance, The Washington
Post, June 18, 1972.
Man Without Property, Business and Society Review,
Summer, 1972.
Corporate Social Responsibility Without Corporate
Suicide, Challenge, July-August, 1973.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Business & Government
Insider Newsletter, July 30, August 6 and August 13, 1973.
Employee Stock Ownership Plans: A Micro-Application of
Macro-Economic Theory, The American University Law Review,
Spring, 1977.
The Greatest Financial Planning Tool of All . . . Could
ESOP Save General Motors?, The Financial Planner, November,
1981.
Sychophantasy in Economics: A Review of
George Gilder's Wealth and Poverty, The Great Ideas
Today, Encyclopœdia Britannica, Inc., Chicago: 1982.
The Right to Be Productive, The Financial Planner,
August and September, 1982.
Tax Reform Is Not the Answer, Chief Executive, Spring,
1983.
How We Can Achieve Lifetime Employment, Chief Executive,
Autumn, 1983.
Damning Binary Economics With Faint Praise, Workplace
Democracy, Summer, 1987.
Leveraged Buyouts Good and Bad, Management Review,
November, 1987.
The Great Savings Snafu, Business and Society Review,
Winter, 1988.
Why Owner-Workers Are Winners, The New York Times,
January 29, 1989.
Why I Invented the ESOP LBO, Leaders,
October/November/December, 1989.
Don't Meddle With ESOPs, The Journal of Commerce,
October 2, 1989.
Looking in a Marxist Mirror, The Journal of Commerce,
January 11, 1991.
ALSO RECOMMENDED - BOOKS
Curing World Poverty: The New Role of Property, edited
by John H. Miller, C.S.C., S.T.D., Social Justice Review,
St. Louis: 1994.
Binary Economics: The New Paradigm, by Robert Ashford
and Rodney Shakespeare, University Press of America, Lanham,
Maryland: 1999.
ALSO RECOMMENDED - WRITINGS
The ESOP According to Kelso, by Stuart Nixon, Air Line
Pilot, October, 1984.
The World According to Kelso, by Steven Hayward, Inland
Business, April, 1987.
Louis Kelso, Capitalist, Bill Moyers: A World of Ideas
II, edited by Andie Tucher, Doubleday, New York: 1990.
The Binary Economics of Louis Kelso: The Promise of
Universal Capitalism, by Robert H. A. Ashford, Rutgers Law
Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1, Fall, 1990.
Louis Kelso's Binary Economy, by Robert Ashford, The
Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 25, No. 1, 1996.
Binary Economic Modes for the Privatization of Public
Assets, by Jerry N. Gauche, The Journal of Socio-Economics,
Vol. 27, No. 3, 1998.
A New Market Paradigm for Sustainable Growth: Financing
Broader Capital Ownership with Louis Kelso's Binary
Economics, by Robert Ashford, Praxis: The Fletcher Journal
of Development Studies, Vol. XIV, The Fletcher School of Law
and Diplomacy, Global Development and Environment Institute,
Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts: 1998.
The Theory of Productiveness: A Microeconomic and
Macroeconomic Analysis of Binary Growth and Output in the
Kelso System, by Stephen V. Kane, The Journal of
Socio-Economics, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2000.
The Ultimate Management Team, by Chris Bayers, WIRED,
January, 2002.
Employee Ownership and Corporate Performance: A
Comprehensive Review of the Evidence, The Journal of
Employee Ownership Law and Finance, Vol. 14, No. 1, National
Center for Employee Ownership (NCEO), Oakland, California:
2002.
Binary Economics, Fiduciary Duties, and Corporate Social
Responsibility: Comprehending Corporate Wealth Maximization
and Distribution for Stockholders, Stakeholders, and
Society, by Robert Ashford, Tulane Law Review, Vol. 76, No.
5-6, June, 2002.
"The Roman arena was technically a
level playing field. But on one side were the lions with
all the weapons, and on the other the Christians with all
the blood. That's not a level playing field. That's a
slaughter. And so is putting people into the economy without
equipping them with capital, while equipping a tiny handful
of people with hundreds and thousands of times more than
they can use."
--Louis O. Kelso in
Bill Moyers: A World of Ideas, (1990)